Opened 21 years ago
Closed 10 months ago
#1042 closed enhancement (fixed)
Adding language "none"
Reported by: | chr | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | low | Milestone: | 2.4.0 |
Component: | spell | Version: | unspecified |
Severity: | minor | Keywords: | fileformat |
Cc: | dov@… |
Description (last modified by )
I think it would be convenient to have a language "none", that is _not_ spell checked. I.e. adding a "language" to
Layout->Character->Language
so that text marked with that language (i.e. none) is not spell checked.
Attachments (1)
Change History (22)
comment:1 by , 21 years ago
Version: | 1.3.1 → unspecified |
---|
comment:2 by , 21 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
I don't think its really useful as you have to switch back to a real language
after spell checking to be able to produce proper output.
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
Hmm... I wonder if you understand the purpose of this. What I'd like is a way to
prevent certain sections of a document from being spell-checked. Such a section
could be a snippet of code, or hexadecimal data etc.
Anyway, the point is that you don't want the spell checker to parse these
sections. I thought one solution to this problem was to mark a section as having
no language, and that this would then prevent the spell checker from checking
that section. From the users' point of view, he'd select a region and then set
the language for *that* region to 'none'.
comment:5 by , 17 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
the point is that you don't want the spell checker to parse these sections.
This is #1509. I think there are some ways to achieve this, not only
introducing a dummy language -> Marked as duplicate.
* This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1509 *
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
I think you were premature in closing this bug as a duplicate (it's not really a
duplicate). We should probably discuss the two bugs on the list. However, to
make things easier I placed some comments in #1509.
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
Resolution: | duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
I agree this is not a duplicate of #1509.
comment:8 by , 17 years ago
The patch proposed for #1509 allows disabling spellchecking for unselected branches. It could provide
a solution for this bug as well: create a branch "IgnoreSpellcheck"; put everything to be ignored into this
branch. When it is unselected, contents of this branch (and also all other unselected branches...) aren't
spellchecked. With this option, you can select/unselect branches to control what should be ignored by the
spellchecker.
by , 17 years ago
Attachment: | spelling-ignore-char-based-take2.patch added |
---|
Adds a character attribute that specifies "no spelling"
comment:9 by , 17 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:10 by , 17 years ago
Keywords: | patch added |
---|
comment:11 by , 15 years ago
Priority: | high → low |
---|
comment:12 by , 15 years ago
Component: | general → spell |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
comment:13 by , 15 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:14 by , 14 years ago
What's the status of this feature? Do we still want to implement this? If yes, can you please send an updated patch top the lyx-devel mailing list?
comment:15 by , 10 years ago
I'd be very happy if this were implemented (I'm writing a thesis in which a lot of medieval Dutch is used). I did notice the patch added by user dov, but I don't have the skills to tinker with my LyX install unsupervised.
comment:16 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | → 2.2.0 |
---|
Letś put this on the radar for 2.2. It should be easy to adapt this patch for the current code.
comment:19 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 2.3.0 → 2.4.0 |
---|
comment:20 by , 6 years ago
Keywords: | fileformat added; patch removed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → fixedinmaster |
Fixed in master at [57dc817581faf/lyxgit].
Lars doesn't want any bugs.